Skip to main content

all is lost | 2013

Imatge relacionada



This is not an epic movie. But it could be considered one of the best movies of the year because it is the antithesis of how the movies are conceived and done. This is a story that refuses the epic, the odyssey, the dialogue, the expression, the plot twists, everything of how we see the cinema today is not reflexed in this film. 

The movie tells the story of a castaway (Robert Redford) of which we don't know the name, the nationality.... we don't know absolutely anything, there aren't any kind of flashbacks or parts of the film where Redford talks about his past or present, nothing. This man has no expression, we have to wait an hour to see a human reaction because during this first hour the film is about a man that follows the logic steps to try and survive in the middle of the Indic Ocean with a broken a sailboat because it collided with a container. Of course, he has to face difficulties a part from the ones that implicitly are assumed when you have a problem like his. But those difficulties aren't shown with epic, we see sharks but they do not do anything, we experience two storms but those storms aren't the main problem of the film.... nothing besides the fact that the man needs help... we don't even know how many days he is expected to live because there aren't clear signs that show us at which point of the survival we are. 

The music in this film is precise and good, and used just in the moments where it is necessary but it isn't shown to illustrate the struggle of the man. As for the performance, Robert Redford does an incredible and remarkable job with his character because there isn't dialogue, but besides that there isn't a reaction, it is just a solitary man not panicked by the situation and just doing what he has to do. 
However this is a risky way of making a film because it can end being a bit boring or provoke that the viewers distract themselves... because they cannot see anything happen. So this is a peculiar film to value because the way that J.C Chandor has made this film is to applaud his originality and risky bet but at the same tame it must be said that this is not a film people are going to enjoy because it does not have the things to keep the viewer on the edge of his seat waiting for the next thing to happen. This is probably the only film that has ever been so good but at the same time so difficult to recommend because you have no powerful arguments or things to say besides the fact that Redford's performance is amazing but he does it without making noise (literally and metaphorically), without being to acclaimed.... and risky way of making cinema that this director has managed to put in practice in this film. 
Really difficult to say if this is a good movie or not, some are going to say it is, others not, this is one of those films where the controversy is totally comprehensible but what it is undisputed is what I just said before. 
So I would end up saying: go, see and give your opinion. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

joker | 2019

Is Joaquin Phoenix's performance of the Joker worth an Oscar nomination? Yes. Ok, but, besides that, why is everybody so hyped by this film? Because we've seen a movie with plenty of superheroes hit the box office this year and now, six months later, just one man, a villain, is stealing the whole show. The one thing that hyped me the most was reading, when the movie premiered at the Venice Film Festival back in September, that this movie didn't have special effects, that it was organic.   I know, I'm not going to say anything you've already read on any film magazine or twitter, instagram or your friends may have commented but I needed to post this.  Joker is a movie that is undoubtedly influenced by Scorsese's films, such as Taxi Driver (1976) and presents a Gotham that reminds us of the 1970's New York. One of the things I liked the most is the contextualisation of the action, because it helped to understand and empathize with Arthur Fleck, the...

the guernsey literary and potato peel pie society | 2018

This film is based on the book written by Ann Shaffer and Annie Barrows where every chapter is a letter written by a different character.  Juliet Ashton (Lily James) is the main character of this lovely film that portrays the story from some citizens from Guernsey Island that became a family when the nazis occupied the island during the II World War. As they had taken away all what they loved, they started a literary club where they discussed about books and life while they refuged from the demands of the nazis.  Juliet Ashton, a londoner who lost her parents when she was a girl, meets this literary club through a letter that Dawsey Adams, a citizen from the island, sends to her when he found out her name and address in a book from the local library that had been abandoned. Juliet that loves reading books, but also is aspiring to be a writer thinks that visting the island can be her inspiration to do so as she is curious about this literary club and its story ...

about time | 2013

What would you do if you had a second chance to live again the moments you've already lived? Probably the answer is that you would try and change the things you did wrong and try and do better the ones you did right.  With this movie, that apparently may seem another romantic comedy from Hollywood, Richard Curtis makes us think of  "time". The time we live and how we live it and how could a normal person use it to live.  At first, Tim, the protagonist, repeats over and over all the things he has lived to change the things he did wrong, after he does it to fall in love with a girl and also to repeat many other things that make this movie a magic movie about time and all of its connotations. The spectator just thinks of how much we need to valorate and live our life because we only have one and we cannot reherse all our steps in this life and then live it again in a perfect way...  The film has something magic, with a great story and performance...